Variable capacitance circuit arrangement

ABSTRACT

A variable capacitance network is disclosed, comprising a plurality of capacitance arms connected in parallel with each other between first and second terminals of the network. Each capacitance arm has a varactor and a series capacitor in series with the varactor A control input applies a common control signal to the junctions between the varactors and their associated series capacitors, to allow for simultaneous control of each varactor.

This application is a divisional application of Ser. No. 10/989,896,filed on Nov. 16, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,187,247, entitled “VariableCapacitance Circuit Arrangement”, currently, and claims prioritytherefrom.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to currently pending UnitedKingdom patent application No. 0327285.3, filed Nov. 24, 2003.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

N/A

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Varactors are commonly used in RF circuits for tuning oscillators,filters and amplifier.

One problem with varactors is that their capacitance/voltagecharacteristics are typically very non-linear as shown in FIG. 1A, whichillustrates a typical metal oxide semiconductor varactor (MOSvar)capacitance/voltage characteristic. The non-linear feature of the MOSvaris emphasized by FIG. 1B which shows the first derivative dC/dV of thecurve of FIG. 1A.

One device allowing a capacitance/voltage characteristic having anacceptable tuning range and a more linear range to be obtained is ahyper-abrupt varactor. However, the implementation of a hyper-abruptvaractor requires extra processing during manufacture, which isexpensive.

An alternative method of overcoming the non-linearity of a varactor isto use digital techniques to switch in capacitors so as to tune over therequired range. However, this solution is complex, can be physicallylarge, and may be too slow.

In a co-pending patent application filed by the present applicants andhaving the same priority date as the present application, priority beingclaimed from GB 0327284.6, there is disclosed a circuit arrangementhaving a variable capacitance for a tuning circuit, the arrangementcomprising a plurality of variable capacitance elements, preferablyvaractors, connected in parallel. Coupled to the varactors are controlmeans for electronically controlling the capacitances of the varactors,the control means having a control range (e.g. a control voltage range)over which they cause the capacitance of the circuit arrangement tovary. The control means and the varactors are configured such that atleast one of the variable capacitance elements exhibits variation of itscapacitance in response to the control means over only a portion of thecontrol range. Such an arrangement can be used to provide a more linearcapacitance response with respect to a control variable, or a responsewhich more closely follows a required non-linear characteristic, than isgenerally obtainable with a single varactor.

Indeed, the preferred arrangement provides a different offset for eachvaractor in a group of varactors so that variation in the overallcapacitance of the arrangement is caused by variation of thecapacitances of the varactors in respective consecutive voltage rangesof a common control voltage. In some implementations of the circuitarrangement, e.g. in a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO), it isnecessary to add a fixed value capacitor in series with theparallel-connected varactors, e.g. to set the center frequency of a VCO.The addition of the series capacitor can have the effect of modifyingthe capacitive response of the arrangement to the extent that therequired approximately linear capacitance versus control variableresponse, or linear frequency versus control variable response is nolonger obtained. This effect is of particular significance when thecapacitance of the series capacitor is smaller than the capacitance ofthe varactors, and can result in the capacitance characteristic beingcomparatively steep over an initial portion of the control range, e.g.when one of the varactors is at a mid-point of its variable capacitancerange and the others are each set at the low end of their capacitanceranges. In other words, the series capacitor can result in variation ofthe capacitance of a first varactor producing a large dC/dV value whichdecreases as the other varactors are brought into operation. This isillustrated in FIG. 8B.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the present invention, a variablecapacitance network comprises: a plurality of capacitance arms connectedin parallel with each other between first and second terminals of thenetwork, each capacitance arm comprising a respective varactor and anassociated series capacitor in series with the varactor; and controlinput means coupled to the junctions between the varactors and theirassociated series capacitors, and arranged to apply a common controlsignal to the varactors.

One side of each of the series capacitors may be connected to the firstterminal and the other side to its associated varactor, the controlinput means comprising individual control voltage lines each coupled toa respective one of the junctions between the varactors and theassociated series capacitors. In general, the control voltage lines eachcontains a respective series impedance coupling the respective junctionto a common control input.

The network typically includes control means having a control voltagerange, the control means causing the capacitance between the first andsecond terminals to vary by, for instance, application of a commoncontrol voltage to the series impedances referred to above and differentoffset voltages applied to the individual varactors such that at leastone of the varactors exhibits a complete variation in its capacitanceover only a portion of the control range of the control means. Thenetwork may be such that each varactor exhibits a complete variation ofits capacitance in response to the control means over only a respectiveportion of the control voltage range, the portions overlapping eachother within the control voltage range so that, as the control voltageis increased over the control voltage range, the individual varactorsare successively brought into their variable capacitance region ofoperation.

Accordingly, the characteristics of the varactors and the offsetvoltages determine the way in which the capacitance of the networkvaries in response to the control means. For example, the variablecapacitance elements may be chosen so as to produce a capacitance versuscontrol voltage response which is more linear over its operating rangecompared with that of a single varactor. Similarly, the variablecapacitance elements may be chosen so as to produce a capacitanceresponse which follows an approximate square law characteristic, for alinearized frequency/voltage response when used in conjunction with aninductor to form a resonant network.

The number of series capacitors is preferably equal to the number ofvaractors in the network.

In one embodiment the capacitors all have the same value.

In another embodiment, the values of the series capacitors are unequal.In particular, they may be weighted so that, as the control voltageincreases, capacitance arms having progressively increasing seriescoupling capacitance are successively brought into the variablecapacitance parts of their characteristics so as to produce a flatteroverall dC/dV characteristic.

Accordingly, by selecting the value of each of the series coupling theresponse of the network to the control voltage can be optimized toobtain a response closer to a required ideal response. In the case ofthe values of capacitance of the series capacitors being weighed, theseries capacitance value determines how effectively the correspondingvaractor is coupled to an external circuit connected across the firstand second terminals. For example, in a network having three seriescapacitors and three varactors, the capacitors may be weighted so theircapacitance values have ratios of 0.8:1:1.2 in the order of activationof the varactors (i.e. the order in which they are brought into thevariable capacitance regions of their capacitance-versus-voltagecharacteristics). It follows that the first varactor is not as wellcoupled to the external circuit as the second and third varactors.

The network may be provided with a clamping circuit such that eachvaractor is operated over a limited voltage range.

As stated above, the control means may comprise a common control sourceand a plurality of different respective offset biases sources.Consequently, a common control voltage and a plurality of different DCoffset voltages are applied to the respective varactors. The voltageapplied across each varactor is, therefore, the difference between thecommon control voltage and the respective offset voltage (or the sum ofthese two voltages, depending on the sign of the offset voltage). Thentuning, the varactor only exhibits a change in its capacitance if thedifference between the control voltage and the respective offset voltagefalls within the range of voltages over which the varactor capacitancevaries, in terms of the voltage applied across the varactor itself.Alternatively, the control means may be configured to apply a pluralityof different control voltages to the respective varactors. Common biasvoltage may then be applied.

Each varactor may be arranged to have one of its electrodes coupled tothe common control voltage source and its other electrode to arespective DC offset bias voltage source.

The capacitance characteristic of the network is dependent on the numberof variable capacitive elements connected in parallel. The more variablecapacitive elements used in the circuit, the closer the capacitancecharacteristic can be to a required response i.e. linear, square law,etc.

Advantageously, the control means are arranged such that the variablecapacitance parts responses of the variable capacitive elements overlap.By adjustment of the overlaps, it is possible to alter the overallcharacteristic of the circuit arrangement to be closer to the requiredcharacteristic.

The variable capacitance elements are preferably selected such that thesum of their maximum individual capacitance values is equal to therequired total maximum capacitance of the circuit arrangement.Additionally, the varactors may be selected such that the combination ofthe ranges over which their individual capacitances vary issubstantially equal to the required total operational range of thenetwork.

The capacitance elements are preferably selected such that the resultantcapacitance/voltage characteristic has a square law characteristic orapproximate square law characteristic. In this embodiment thecharacteristic of each capacitance element may be different from thecharacteristics of the other capacitance elements.

Where, instead, a generally linear capacitance/voltage characteristic isrequired, the individual variable capacitance elements may be chosensuch that the maximum capacitance of each element is approximately equalto the maximum required capacitance of the network divided by the numberof parallel variable capacitive elements. In addition, the individualvariable capacitive elements may be chosen such that the range overwhich each of their individual capacitances vary is equal to the totaloperating range of the network divided by the number of capacitiveelements connected in parallel. For example, if there are three variablecapacitive elements in the network, the characteristics of thecapacitive elements are such that their individual maximum capacitancesare each equal to a third of the total capacitance of the network andtheir effective operating ranges are each approximately a third of thetotal operating range of the network.

Other capacitance/voltage characteristics or laws may be produced byselection of individual varactor characteristics, coupling capacitorvalues, and/or individual bias voltages.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, a tunable radiofrequency (RF) circuit comprises a circuit arrangement having a variabletuning capacitance, wherein the circuit arrangement comprises aplurality of tuning varactors connected in parallel, and coupled to thetuning varactors, control means arranged to apply a common controlsignal to each varactor for electronically controlling the capacitancesof the varactors, and one or more inductors, the control means having acontrol range over which they cause the capacitance of the circuitarrangement to vary, and wherein the varactors each have a respectivefixed capacitor connected in series with it, the resulting seriescombination being coupled to the inductor or one of the inductors, thecontrol means being coupled to the nodes between the varactors and theirrespective fixed capacitors.

In one embodiment, the circuit includes a modulator which comprises amodulation varactor arranged in parallel with the tuning varactors butisolated therefrom by a DC blocking capacitor, the modulation varactorbeing coupled to a modulation input. The modulation varactor may have anoffset voltage applied to one of its electrodes by a modulation biasvoltage source.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provideda voltage controllable oscillator comprising: an inductance; a pluralityof tuning circuit arms connected in parallel with each other across theinductance, each tuning circuit arm comprising a respective varactor andan associated series capacitor in series with the varactor; and controlinput means coupled to the junctions between the varactors and theirassociated series capacitors and arranged to apply a common controlsignal to each varactor. Tuning control means are preferably providedwhich electronically vary the capacitances of the varactors by applyinga varying voltage to the control input means over a control voltagerange, the tuning control means and the varactors being configured suchthat at least one of the varactors exhibits variation of its capacitancein response to the control means over only a portion of the controlvoltage range.

The tuning control means preferably comprises a plurality of voltagesources arranged to apply to each varactor a voltage V_(ci) whereV_(ci)=V_(c)−V_(i), V_(c) being a variable control voltage and V_(i)being a bias voltage for each respective varactor_(i), the value ofV_(i) being different for the different varactors.

The varactors, the series capacitors, and the control means arepreferably configured to yield an approximately linear frequency versuscontrol voltage response.

The oscillator may include a modulator circuit arm connected in parallelwith the tuning circuit arms and across the inductance, the modulatorcircuit arm comprising a modulation varactor and an associated seriescapacitor in series with the varactor, and modulation input meanscoupled to the junction of the modulation varactor and its associatedseries capacitor.

Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth inpart in the description that follows, and in part will be obvious fromthe description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. Theobjects and advantages-of the invention may be realized and attained bymeans of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed outin the appended claims.

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of this specification, illustrate at least one presently preferredembodiment of the invention as well as some alternative embodiments.These drawings, together with the description, serve to explain theprinciples of the invention but by no means are intended to beexhaustive of all of the possible manifestations of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a graph illustrating a typical capacitance/voltage (C/V)characteristic of a varactor;

FIG. 1B is a graph illustrating the first derivative (dC/dV) of thecharacteristic of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a circuit arrangement with a linearizedresponse;

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating a C/V characteristic of the circuitarrangement of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the C/V characteristics shown in FIGS. 1Aand 3 in a single representation;

FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the first derivative (dC/dV) of thecapacitance response of the circuit arrangement of FIG. 2;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a circuit arrangement similar to thatof FIG. 2, including a modulator;

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a voltage controlled oscillator usingthe principle embodied in the circuit arrangement of FIG. 2.

FIG. 8A is a schematic diagram of the circuit arrangement of FIG. 2 witha coupling capacitor connecting a plurality of varactors to a terminalof the network;

FIG. 8B is a graph illustrating a C/V characteristic of the circuitarrangement of FIG. 8A;

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a capacitance network having aplurality of capacitance arms each comprising a varactor and aseries-connected coupling capacitor;

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of a circuit arrangement including acapacitance network of FIG. 9 together with a modulator; and

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a capacitance arm for use in thecircuitry shown in. FIGS. 9 and 10, including a voltage clampingstructure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Reference now will be made in detail to the presently preferredembodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which areillustrated in the accompanying drawings. Each example is provided byway of explanation of the invention, which is not restricted to thespecifics of the examples. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilledin the art that various modifications and variations can be made in thepresent invention without departing from the scope or spirit of theinvention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part ofone embodiment, can be used on another embodiment to yield a stillfurther embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present inventioncover such modifications and variations as come within the scope of theappended claims and their equivalents. The same numerals are assigned tothe same components throughout the drawings and description.

Referring to FIG. 2, a variable capacitance circuit arrangement 100 hasa variable capacitance formed by three varactors 110, 112, 114 which areconnected in parallel. The varactors 110, 112, 114 are each connected atone of their electrodes to a respective DC offset voltage source V1, V2,V3 and, at the other electrode, to a common control input 116 forsupplying a control voltage V_(control) via a series impedance 118. Inthis embodiment each of the offset voltage sources V1, V2, V3 isconnected in series between the anode of the respective varactor and oneof the supply rails of the, arrangement, in this case to ground, thevaractor cathodes being coupled to the control input. The DC offsetvoltage sources V1, V2, V3 each have a different offset voltage levelsuch that each of the varactors 110, 112, 114 contributes to thevariation in overall capacitance only when the difference between thecontrol voltage and the respective offset bias voltage falls within thevoltage range (in terms of the voltage across the varactor) over whichthe varactor exhibits a variation in capacitance.

In this embodiment, the different offset voltages V1, V2, and V3 aresuch that V1 is smaller than V2 which is, in turn, smaller than V3.Therefore, assuming that the individual characteristics of the varactorsare similar, if the control voltage is raised progressively from thelower limit of its range to its upper limit, the operation of thecircuit 100 will sequentially bring the first varactor 110 into thevariable part of its characteristic, followed by the second varactor112, and finally the third varactor 114.

The different offset voltage levels may be achieved by a number ofdifferent arrangements, as would be known by a person of ordinary skillin the art. These arrangements can include the use of a voltage dividercircuit, zener diodes, individual DC power sources and the like.

The characteristics of the varactors 110, 112, 114 are selected suchthat the sum of their maximum respective capacitances is equal to therequired total maximum capacitance of the circuit arrangement 100. Inaddition, the varactor characteristics are selected such that the sum ofthe maximum ranges of variation in capacitance of the varactors is equalto the required total variation in capacitance of the circuitarrangement 100. If a substantially linear variation of the overallcapacitance with control voltage is required, the varactors are selectedso as to have the same or generally similar characteristics, at leastinsofar as they have at least approximately equal capacitance ranges andcapacitance-versus-voltage slopes. If the overall capacitance is tofollow an approximate square law characteristic with respect to voltage,as may be required to achieve a linearized tuningfrequency-versus-voltage characteristic in a resonantinductance/capacitance circuit such as in an. RF voltage-controlledoscillator (VCO), the varactors 110, 112, 114 may be selected to havedifferent capacitance ranges. For instance, the varactor associated withthe highest offset voltage may be chosen to have a greater range ofvariation of capacitance and a steeper capacitance-versus-voltage slope.

The offset voltages applied to the varactors are preferably set suchthat there is an overlap, with respect to control voltage, between thehigh capacitance part of the variable capacitance range of one varactorand the low capacitance part of the range of capacitance of another ofthe varactors. Overlapping of the variable portions of respectivecharacteristics in this way, as depicted in FIG. 3, contributes to thelinearity of the capacitance/voltage characteristics of the compositearrangement 100.

The circuit arrangement 100 is operable such that as the control voltageis increased from a minimum to a maximum voltage, each of the varactorsis sequentially operated. That is to say, as the control voltage isincreased the varactors are activated such that there is an overlapbetween the high capacitance part of the capacitance variation range ofone varactor and the low capacitance part of the range of capacitancevariation of another of the varactors. The total capacitance of thecircuit arrangement 100 is equivalent to the sum of the capacitance ofeach of the varactors.

FIG. 4 shows the capacitance versus voltage characteristic of thecircuit arrangement 100 of FIG. 2 superimposed on the equivalent curveof a circuit having a typical single MOSvar, as shown in FIG. 1A. It canbe seen that the curve of the circuit arrangement 100 is more linearthan that of the single MOSvar. This fact is more clearly seen in FIG. 5which illustrates the first derivative dC/dV of the characteristic ofFIG. 3. It can be see that the circuit arrangement 100 produces lessvariation in the dC/dV characteristic over the operational controlvoltage range compared with that of the dC/dV characteristic of thetypical MOSvar, as evidenced by the approximately flat character of therelevant part of the curve.

To summarize, the circuit arrangement 100 has a capacitive network madeup of a number of varactors connected in parallel, each varactor beinginherently non-linear over its operating range, and yet the network as awhole has the advantage of a more linear capacitance versus controlinput response compared to that of the typical single varactorimplementation capable of capacitance variation over the same range.

The circuit arrangement 100 has many different applications. However, itis of particular benefit in RF tuning circuits such as voltagecontrolled oscillators, filters and tuned amplifiers.

Referring now to FIG. 6 of the drawings, the capacitance part of avoltage controlled oscillator VCO 200 in accordance with the inventionincludes a modulator 220. Tuning of the oscillator is accomplished by anetwork of parallel varactors coupled to a control input and respectiveoffset sources as described above with reference to FIG. 2. Themodulator 220 comprises a varactor 222 connected effectively in parallelwith the varactors 110, 112, 114 of the tuning network. The modulatorvaractor is connected at one of its electrodes to a DC offset biasvoltage source V4 and at its other electrode to a modulation input 223for receiving a modulation signal V_(mod). The varactor 222 is coupledto the circuit arrangement 100 via a DC blocking capacitor 224, therebyisolating the modulation input 223 from the control input 116.

Use of an additional varactor 222 specifically for frequency modulationof the VCO output signal, the modulation being applied to this varactordirectly from a modulation input which is isolated from the controlinput 116, has the advantage that the sensitivity of the modulationprocess can be set substantially independently of the VCO tuningfrequency. That is to say, the variations in capacitance produced by themodulation signal applied to the modulation input 226 do not varysignificantly in magnitude for a given modulation voltage amplitude asthe VCO operating frequency alters. Accordingly, the depth of modulationremains substantially constant.

Referring to FIG. 7, an emitter coupled LC oscillator 300 incorporatingvariable capacitance circuitry as described above has a cross-coupledtransistor pair Q0, Q1 arranged as a voltage controllable oscillatorwith a differential output across the collectors of the transistors Q0,Q1. The frequency of the oscillator 300 is determined by the inductiveand capacitive components connected to the collectors of thecross-coupled transistor pair Q0, Q1 and to the virtual ground formed bya bias block 302, which incorporates a plurality of offset voltagesources producing the varactor bias voltages V1, V2 and V3. In thiscircuit, the frequency-determining components are inductors L1 and L2,coupling capacitors C0 and C1 and varactors C10, C11, C12, C13, C14 andC15,

Each varactor is connected to a respective DC offset voltage source V1,V2 or V3 in the bias block 302 and the total capacitance of thevaractors is adjusted by varying the value of the control voltage,V_(control).

Accordingly, the connections between the voltage bias block 302 and thevaractors connected to bias voltages sources V1, V2 and V3 can beconsidered to be an RF ground. Therefore, the varactors C10, C11 andC13, located on the left hand side (LHS) of the circuit, are effectivelyconnected in parallel at radio frequencies. The total capacitance of thefrequency-determining components on the LHS of the circuit is thecapacitance resulting from the connection of coupling capacitor CO inseries with the total capacitance of the parallel-connected varactorsC10, C11 and C13. Similarly, the capacitance of thefrequency-determining components on the right-hand side (RHS) of thecircuit comprises coupling capacitor C1 in series with the parallelcombination of the varactors C13, C14 and C15. The total capacitance ofthe frequency-determining components in the oscillator 300 is equal tothe overall capacitance of the frequency-determining capacitances (C1,C13, C14, C15) on the RHS in series with the overall capacitance of thefrequency-determining capacitances (C0, C10, C11, C12) on the LHS,

The total inductance of the inductive frequency-determining componentsin the oscillator 300 is equal to the inductance of inductor L1 inseries with that of the inductor L2.

The transistors Q0, Q1 are connected at their bases to a bias voltagesource V_(B) via resistors R3 and R4 respectively so as to forward biastheir base-emitter junctions.

The transistors Q0, Q1 are capacitively cross-coupled. Specifically,coupling capacitors C2 and C3 couple the signals generated at thecollectors of transistors Q1 and Q0 to the bases of the transistors Q0,Q1 respectively to cause oscillation in a well-known manner. Thevaractor pairs C10, C13; C11, C14; and C12, C15 are selected such thatthe varactors of each pair have the same C/V characteristic. However,the C/V characteristic of each pair may be selected to have a differentcharacteristic and in particular different capacitance ranges. In apreferred embodiment, the C/V characteristic of the complete set ofvaractors follows a square law curve in order to achieve a linearizedfrequency/voltage characteristic for the voltage controllableoscillator. This can be achieved, for example, by use of a varactorassociated with the highest offset voltage which has a characteristichaving a steeper C/V curve and extends over a larger capacitive range.

Variations are possible. For example, the control means may comprise aplurality of control sources connected to the plurality of variablecapacitance elements; or a common offset bias and a plurality ofdifferent value control sources connected to the variable capacitanceelements. Furthermore, the circuit arrangement 100 may be used for atunable filter or any other application requiring a linearized variablecapacitance.

It will be noted that the VCO of FIG. 7 has series-connected couplingcapacitors C0, C1 between each group of varactors C10, C11, C12; C13,C14, C15 and the inductors L1, L2. Referring to a simplifiedillustration of such an arrangement, as appearing in FIG. 8A, it will beseen that the circuit arrangement comprises a capacitance network havingthree capacitance arms 400A, 400B, 400C, each containing a varactor 110,112, 114, the capacitance arms being coupled between first and secondterminals 402, 403 of the network with an interposed series capacitor404. When the network is used in a VCO, the capacitor 404 is selected tobring the center frequency of the oscillator to within a required range.If the capacitance of the series coupling capacitor 404 is large incomparison to the combined capacitance of the varactors 110, 112,114,the capacitance-versus-voltage characteristic and the derivative (thedC/dV characteristic) may not deviate significantly from the curvesshown in FIGS. 3, 4 and 5. However, if the coupling capacitor 404 is notlarge in comparison with the capacitance of the varactors, the dC/dVcharacteristic can become skewed, as shown in FIG. 8. As will be seen,the coupling capacitor has the effect of producing a large dC/dV valueat low control voltages (when the varactor capacitances are low), and adecreasing value as the control voltage increases over the operationalrange of the network.

In accordance with the invention, this difficulty can be overcome by anetwork in which each varactor has a respective series-connectedcoupling capacitor 440, 442, 444 in the respective capacitance arm, asshown in FIG. 9. These coupling capacitors replace the single couplingcapacitor 120 of the network shown in FIG. 8A.

Each of the plurality of coupling capacitors is arranged to couple anindividual varactor 110, 112, 114 to the first terminal 402, to which anexternal circuit or component can be connected.

The capacitances of the varactors 110, 112 and 114 are altered byapplying a control voltage V_(control) on a control voltage input 450.The network includes control input means comprising a plurality ofcontrol lines each including a series resistance 460, 462, 464 and eachconnecting the control input 450 to the node between the varactor 110,112, 114 and the series coupling capacitor 440, 442, 444 of a respectivecapacitance arm. These control input impedance maybe inductors insteadof resistors.

The fixed value coupling capacitors 440, 442, 444 are used inconjunction with the varactors 110, 112, 114 to set the center frequencyof the oscillator, the tuning range of the oscillator being defined bythe combined capacitance range of the varactors. The capacitors 440,442, 444 may all have the same capacitance value in which case animprovement in the frequency-versus-voltage characteristic or thecapacitance-versus-voltage characteristics compared to the network witha single coupling capacitor can be achieved. In other words, it ispossible to bring the dC/dV characteristic nearer to that shown in FIG.5B. However, the characteristics can be brought closer still to theideal characteristic by adopting different values for the couplingcapacitors, preferably by weighting or scaling them. Weighting thecapacitors determines the degree to which each varactor is coupled tothe terminal 402. In the network of FIG. 9, in which there are threecoupling capacitors, the capacitors are typically selected to havevalues in the ratios of 0.8:1:1.2, where the offset voltages V1, V2 andV3 in the respective arms are such that V1 is less than V2, and V2 isless than V3. This means that the values of the coupling capacitors inthe respective capacitance arms are successively greater in the order inwhich the varactors are brought into their variable capacitance regionsas the control voltage V_(control) increases. Thus, the varactor 110 isbrought into its variable capacitance region before the varactors 112and 114 and is, therefore, more loosely coupled to the terminal 402 ofthe network. Similarly, the second varactor 112 is more strongly coupledto the terminal 402 than the first varactor 110, but less stronglycoupled than the third varactor 114.

It will be evident, now, how the VCO described above with reference toFIG. 7 may be modified in the event that relatively small couplingcapacitors C0 and C1 are needed. Instead of connecting the nodes of eachgroup of three varactors C10, C11, C12 together directly, each has arespective coupling capacitor connected to the inductor L1, and separateresistors connect the common control input to the respective nodesbetween the coupling capacitors and the individual varactors. Similarly,coupling capacitor Cl is replaced by individual coupling capacitors inseries with the varactors of C13, C14, C15 of the second group, eachconnecting the respective varactor to the inductor L2. Again, the seriescontrol input resistance R2 is replaced by separate resistors asdescribed above with reference to the first group of varactors C10, C11,C12. Following the principle outlined above, the coupling capacitors maybe weighted such that those connected in the capacitance arms containingthe varactors C12, C13 which are biased with the lowest biasing voltageV1 are smaller than the coupling capacitors in the capacitance armscontaining the varactors C11, C14 biased with an offset voltage V2,while the coupling capacitors associated with the varactors C10, C15associated with the highest bias voltage V3, have the highestcapacitance.

Referring now to FIG. 10 of the drawings, the capacitance part of a VCO500 in accordance with the invention may include a modulator 520. Tuningof the oscillator is accomplished using a tuning network of parallelcapacitance arms each coupled to a control input and respective offsetsources as described above with reference to FIG. 9. The modulator 520comprises a modulation varactor 522 connected effectively in parallelwith the tuning varactors 110, 112, 114 of the tuning network. Themodulation varactor 522 is connected at one of its electrodes, here theanode, to a DC offset bias voltage source having a voltage value V4 andat its other electrode, here the cathode, to a modulation input 523 forreceiving a modulation signal V_(mod). The modulation varactor 522 iscoupled to the circuit arrangement 400 via a DC blocking capacitor 524,thereby isolating the modulation input 523 from the control input 416 atlow frequencies.

Use of an additional varactor 522 specifically for frequency modulationof the VCO output signal, with the modulation being applied to thisvaractor directly from a modulation input which is isolated from thecontrol input 416, has the advantage that the sensitivity of themodulation process can be set substantially independently of the VCOtuning frequency. That is to say, the variations in capacitance producedby a modulation signal of given amplitude applied to the modulationinput 526 do not vary significantly as the VCO operating frequencyalters. Accordingly, the depth of modulation remains substantiallyconstant.

In some cases, it may be necessary to restrict the range of voltagesapplied to the varactors in the circuit arrangements described above.Such voltage restriction can be achieved by means of clamping structuresapplied to the varactors. The circuit illustrated in FIG. 11 is asimplified schematic diagram of one of the capacitance arms of thenetwork of FIG. 9 or that of FIG. 10, together with the associatedcontrol input circuitry. To these components there is added a voltageclamp comprising a switch 600 (embodied as an electronic switch inpractice) between the varactor 110 and its bias voltage source V1. Anoffset voltage source 602 having the value V_(offset) is connectedbetween the junction of the varactor 110 and its associated seriescoupling capacitor 440 and the input of a voltage follower 604, theoutput of which is also connected to the switch 600. Depending on thestate of the switch 600, the varactor 110 is connected either to thebias voltage source V1 or to the output of the voltage follower 604. Thevoltage on the voltage follower output is equal toV_(control)+V_(offset) where V_(control) is the control voltage appliedto the varactor 110 from the control input 450 via resistor 460 andV_(offset), is an offset voltage equivalent to a maximum permittedreverse bias voltage across the varactor 110. The voltage clamp includesa comparator 606 which compares the voltage at the input of the voltagefollower 604 (which equals the voltage at the voltage follower output)with the voltage on bias voltage source V1. The comparator 606 has anoutput which controls the switch 600 according to whether or not thevoltage at the input to the voltage follower 604 is above or below thevoltage of bias voltage source V1.

The comparator 606 and the switch 600 operate together in such a waythat, so long as the control voltage V_(control) drops no lower than Vlless the voltage V_(offset), the varactor remains connected to the biasvoltage source V1. Once the reverse-bias threshold is crossed, however,the switch changes state and the voltage on the anode of the varactor110 varies in step with the control voltage V_(control) with a constantreverse-bias voltage equal to the magnitude of the offset voltageV_(offset).

The variable capacitance networks described above have a number ofapplications. They are of particular benefit in RF tuning circuits suchas voltage controlled oscillators, filters and tuned amplifiers.

Variations may be made without departing from the scope of theinvention. For example, the control means may comprise a plurality ofcontrol sources connected to the plurality of variable capacitanceelements; or a common offset bias and a plurality of different valuecontrol sources connected to the capacitance elements.

The disclosure of the specification and drawings of our co-pendingapplication mentioned above is explicitly incorporated in the presentspecification and drawings by reference. That application discloses acircuit arrangement having a variable capacitance for a tuning circuit,wherein the circuit arrangement comprises a plurality of variablecapacitance elements connected in parallel and, coupled to thecapacitance elements, control means for electronically controlling thecapacitances of the variable capacitance elements, the control meanshaving a control range over which they cause the capacitance of thecircuit arrangement to vary, the control means and the variablecapacitance elements being configured such that at least one of the saidelements exhibits variation of its capacitance in response to thecontrol means over only a portion of the control range. In that case,the control means and the variable capacitance elements are configuredsuch that each of the elements exhibits variation of its capacitance inresponse to the control means over only a respective portion of thecontrol range, the portions overlapping each other within the controlrange. The control means may be arranged to energize each of thecapacitive elements in a sequential manner as the common control voltageincreases over the control range.

The co-pending application is also directed to a tunable RF circuitcomprising a circuit arrangement having a variable tuning capacitance,wherein the circuit arrangement comprises a plurality of tuningvaractors connected in parallel, and coupled to the tuning varactors,control means for electronically controlling the capacitances of thevaractors, and one or more inductors, the control means having a controlrange over which they cause the capacitance of the circuit arrangementto vary, the control means and the varactors being configured such thatat least one of the varactors exhibits variation of its capacitance inresponse to the control means over only a portion of the control range.The circuit arrangement may include a modulator which comprises amodulation varactor arranged in parallel to the tuning varactors, themodulation varactor being coupled to a modulation input. In such a casethe modulation varactor preferably has a voltage offset applied to oneof its electrodes.

Another aspect of the co-pending application is a VCO comprising acircuit arrangement having a variable capacitance for a tuning circuit,wherein the circuit arrangement comprises a plurality of varactorsconnected in parallel, and coupled to the varactors, control means forelectronically controlling the capacitances of the varactors, thecontrol means having a control range over which they cause thecapacitance of the circuit arrangement to vary, the control means andthe varactors being configured such that at least one of the varactorsexhibits variation of its capacitance in response to the control meansover only a portion of the control range. As in the network describedabove, the circuit arrangement may be arranged to achieve asubstantially linear oscillation frequency versus control voltagecharacteristic by having a generally square law capacitance withrespective voltage characteristic.

Yet another aspect of the co-pending application is a tunable radio RFcircuit comprising: the resonant combination of a tuning varactor, amodulation varactor and an associated inductance, the tuning varactorand the modulation varactor being respectively coupled to a tuningcontrol input and modulation input which are DC isolated from eachother.

A presently preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown inFIG. 2.

While at least one presently preferred embodiment of the invention hasbeen described using specific terms, such description is forillustrative purposes only, and it is to be understood that changes andvariations may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of thefollowing claims.

1. A voltage-controllable oscillator comprising: an inductance; aplurality of tuning circuit arms connected in parallel with each otheracross the inductance, each tuning circuit arm comprising a respectivevaractor and an associated series capacitor having a capacitance valueand being in series with that respective varactor; and control inputmeans coupled to the junctions between the varactors and theirassociated series capacitors, and arranged to apply a common controlsignal to each varactor; wherein series capacitors capacitance valuesare weighted such that, as a control voltage is increased, tuning armshaving progressively increasing fixed capacitance values aresuccessively brought into their variable capacitive regions.
 2. Anoscillator according to claim 1, wherein one side of each of the seriescapacitors is connected to a first terminal and the other side to anassociated varactor, and the control input means comprise individualcontrol voltage lines each coupled to a respective one of the junctions.3. An oscillator according to claim 2, wherein the control voltage lineseach contain a respective series impedance coupling the respectivejunction to a common control input.
 4. An oscillator according to claim1, including control means having a control voltage range over whichthey cause the capacitance between the first and second terminals tovary, and wherein the control means and the varactors are configuredsuch that at least one of the varactors exhibits a complete variation inits capacitance over only a portion of the control range.
 5. Anoscillator according to claim 4, wherein the control means and thevaractors are configured such that each varactor exhibits completevariation of its capacitance in response to the control means over onlya respective portion of the control voltage range, the portionsoverlapping each other within the control voltage range.
 6. Anoscillator according to claim 1, wherein control voltage source and thebias voltage sources are arranged such that the resultant voltage acrosseach varactor is the difference between a voltage applied by the commoncontrol source and the voltage of the respective bias source.
 7. Anoscillator according to claim 1, wherein the series capacitors havedifferent capacitance values.
 8. An oscillator according to claim 1,including clamping devices associated with the varactors to limit theoperational ranges of the varactors.
 9. An oscillator according to claim4, wherein the control means and the varactors are configured such thateach varactor exhibits complete variation of its capacitance in responseto the control means over only a respective portion of a control rangeof the control means.
 10. An oscillator according to claim 4, whereinthe control means are arranged to drive each of the varactors in asequential manner as a control voltage produced by the control meansincreases over the control range.
 11. A variable capacitance networkcomprising: a plurality of capacitance arms connected in parallel witheach other between first and second terminals of the network, eachcapacitance arm comprising a respective varactor and an associatedseries capacitor having a capacitance value and being in series withthat varactor; control input means coupled to the junctions between thevaractors and their associated series capacitors, and arranged to applya control signal to each varactor; and control means having a controlvoltage range over which they cause the capacitance between the firstand second terminals to vary; wherein the series capacitors andcapacitance values are weighted such that, as the control voltage isincreased, capacitor arms having progressively increasing seriescapacitance values are successively brought into their variablecapacitance regions.
 12. A network according to claim 11, wherein oneside of each of the series capacitors is connected to the first terminaland the other side to its associated varactor, and the control inputmeans comprise individual control voltage lines each coupled to arespective one of the junctions.
 13. A network according to claim 12,wherein the control voltage lines each contain a respective seriesimpedance coupling the respective junction to a common control input.14. A network according to claim 11, including control means having acontrol voltage range over which they cause the capacitance between thefirst and second terminals to vary, and wherein the control means andthe varactors are configured such that at least one of the varactorsexhibits a complete variation in its capacitance over only a portion ofthe control range.
 15. A network according to claim 14, wherein thecontrol means and the varactors are configured such that each varactorexhibits complete variation of its capacitance in response to thecontrol means over only a respective portion of the control voltagerange, the portions overlapping each other within the control voltagerange.
 16. A network according to claim 11, wherein control voltagesource and the bias voltage sources are arranged such that the resultantvoltage across each varactor is the difference between a voltage appliedby the common control source and the voltage of the respective biassource.
 17. A network according to claim 11, wherein the seriescapacitors have different capacitance values.
 18. A network according toclaim 11, including clamping devices associated with the varactors tolimit the operational ranges of the varactors.
 19. A network accordingto claim 14, wherein the control means and the varactors are configuredsuch that each varactor exhibits complete variation of its capacitancein response to the control means over only a respective portion of acontrol range of the control means.
 20. A tunable radio frequency (RF)circuit comprising: a circuit arrangement having a variable tuningcapacitance including: a plurality of tuning varactors effectivelyconnected in parallel and coupled to the tuning varactors; control meansarranged to apply a control signal to each varactor for electronicallycontrolling the capacitances of the varactors; and one or moreinductors, wherein the control means has a control range over which thevaractors cause the capacitance of the circuit arrangement to vary, andwherein the varactors each have a respective fixed capacitor connectedin series having a capacitance value, the resulting series combinationbeing coupled to the at least one inductor, the control means beingcoupled to the nodes between the varactors and their respective fixedcapacitors, wherein the fixed capacitor capacitance values are weightedsuch that as the control voltage is increased, capacitance arms havingprogressively increasing fixed capacitance are successively brought intotheir variable capacitance regions.